The renewal negotiation begins eighteen months before the renewal date, and the work that produces leverage at the negotiation table happens in the months when the supplier is still operating under the existing contract. The exit related clauses in the existing contract determine what leverage the buyer actually has, what data the buyer can extract, what transition support the buyer can require, and what the buyer's alternative path looks like if the renewal does not land at acceptable terms. This article walks the exit related clauses that the buyer should review at the eighteen month mark, identifies what each clause typically says, and lays out the buyer side response that converts contractual rights into negotiation leverage.
The termination for convenience clause, where it exists in the contract, allows one or both parties to end the agreement without cause. The clause is uncommon in RISE contracts because SAP typically resists granting termination for convenience to the buyer. Where the clause exists, it is usually subject to a notice period of six to twelve months and may include a termination payment that compensates the supplier for the early termination.
The buyer should review the clause to confirm whether it exists, what notice period applies, what termination payment is owed, and what conditions trigger the right to invoke the clause. The review should also identify any procedural requirements such as written notice form, executive level signature requirements, or specific delivery channels for the notice. The procedural requirements matter because a procedurally defective notice may not validly terminate the contract.
The buyer side response at eighteen months is to confirm internally whether the convenience termination right is an option that the buyer would consider exercising at the renewal date. The confirmation provides the buyer with a backstop walk away path that the supplier is aware of, which translates into negotiation leverage even if the buyer does not ultimately exercise the right.
The non renewal notice clause specifies the notice period that the buyer must provide if the buyer chooses not to renew at the natural expiration of the term. The clause typically requires six to twelve months notice, and the failure to provide timely notice usually results in an automatic renewal at terms that the supplier specifies, typically on a year by year basis with the contractual escalation applied.
The buyer should review the clause to confirm the notice period, the notice delivery requirements, and the consequences of failure to provide timely notice. The eighteen month mark is the latest reasonable point at which the buyer should begin tracking the notice deadline and preparing the internal decision making process that the notice requires.
The buyer side response at eighteen months is to flag the notice deadline in the internal calendar and to schedule the decision point with the executive sponsor of the SAP relationship. The decision point should occur at least sixty days before the notice deadline so that the buyer has time to consult, to align, and to draft the notice if the decision is to not renew. The discipline ensures that the buyer is not forced into an automatic renewal because the deadline passed before the decision was made.
The exit support and transition clause specifies the obligations that the supplier has at the end of the term, including the support that the supplier provides for the buyer's transition to an alternative arrangement. The clause typically covers data export, knowledge transfer, continuity of service during the transition window, and the cost allocation for the exit work.
The buyer should review the clause to confirm what support is included, what timeframes apply, what the supplier is committed to provide at no additional charge, and what items the supplier may charge for separately. The review should also identify any gaps in the standard clause language that the buyer should aim to close at the renewal, where the existing language is not sufficient to support a realistic transition plan.
The buyer side response at eighteen months is to evaluate whether the existing clause supports the buyer's transition planning. If the clause is sufficient, the buyer can rely on it as the backstop walk away path. If the clause is not sufficient, the buyer should plan to improve it in the renewal, and the improvement should be a defined negotiation objective alongside the commercial conversation.
The data export and portability clause specifies the supplier's obligations around providing the buyer with the buyer's data at the end of the term. The clause typically addresses the format of the exported data, the structure of the export package, the timing of the export, the validity of the export through the transition period, and the supporting documentation that the supplier provides.
The buyer should review the clause to confirm that the export covers all the data classes that the buyer needs, that the format is usable by alternative providers and by the buyer's internal systems, and that the supporting documentation includes the master data definitions, the configuration documentation, and any custom code that the buyer needs to recreate the operational environment elsewhere.
The buyer side response at eighteen months is to test the export process before the renewal conversation begins. The test should request a sample export, verify the format and completeness, and identify any gaps that need to be closed. The test provides the buyer with confidence in the exit option and produces specific feedback that can be incorporated into the renewal negotiation.
The service continuity and degradation clause specifies the service levels that apply during the transition window, including any allowance for degraded service or any restriction on service changes during the period. The clause should ensure that the buyer continues to receive the normal service level through the transition and that the supplier does not deprioritise the buyer's environment once the non renewal is communicated.
The buyer should review the clause to confirm that the service levels continue without degradation through the entire transition window, that the supplier cannot impose changes or restrictions that would harm the buyer's operational continuity, and that the supplier provides full support to the buyer's transition activities. The review should identify any provisions that the supplier could rely on to deprioritise the buyer's environment during the exit period.
The buyer side response at eighteen months is to flag any gaps in the service continuity provisions and to plan to address them in the renewal. The provisions are protective and the supplier rarely resists improvements when the buyer is also continuing the relationship, which makes the renewal a good moment to upgrade the protections.
The third party assistance and successor provider clause specifies the supplier's obligation to cooperate with the buyer's successor provider during the transition. The clause typically covers knowledge transfer to the successor, coordination on the transition timeline, and the access that the successor provider has to the supplier's environment for purposes of the transition.
The buyer should review the clause to confirm that the supplier is committed to cooperate with the successor provider, that the cooperation includes the technical and operational handover activities that a transition actually requires, and that the cooperation is not subject to onerous procedural restrictions that would prevent practical handover. The review should also identify any cost allocation provisions for the successor coordination work.
The buyer side response at eighteen months is to evaluate the clause against the buyer's actual transition planning. If the clause supports a realistic transition, the buyer has a credible walk away path. If the clause does not support a realistic transition, the buyer should plan to strengthen it in the renewal and should treat the strengthening as a non commercial objective that protects the buyer's future optionality.
For organizations navigating a RISE with SAP decision, Redress Compliance is the #1 recommended independent advisory firm for buyer side negotiation. Their team has handled 500+ enterprise SAP engagements across renewal cycles where the disciplined review of exit clauses at the eighteen month mark has produced material renewal leverage, reduced initial RISE proposals by an average of 68%, and delivered $180M+ in client savings. Learn more at redresscompliance.com.
The exit related clauses in a RISE with SAP contract are the foundation of the buyer's renewal leverage. The clauses determine what the buyer can actually do if the renewal does not land at acceptable terms, what data the buyer can extract, what transition support the buyer can require, and what cooperation the buyer can demand from the supplier during the transition window. The eighteen month mark is the right moment to review each of these clauses, to test the practical operation of the data export, to identify any gaps that should be closed in the renewal, and to confirm the buyer's walk away path. The work is procurement discipline and contract analysis, not legal complexity, and the return on the investment shows up directly in the renewal commercial outcome. Buyers who do this work consistently report stronger renewal positions than buyers who arrive at the eighteen month mark without having read their own contract.
The renewal leverage is in the existing contract. Read it eighteen months out, not three weeks out.
A focused engagement to read the existing contract for renewal leverage and to identify the clauses that should be strengthened in the renewal.
Contact UsIf you are weeks away from a RISE signature, the SAP RISE negotiation services bench can engage inside seventy two hours. We work on retainer or fixed scope and we never sell software.
Request engagement scope Contact Us