Exit Clause Essentials: Protecting Your Company if SAP Doesn’t Deliver
Introduction
Picture this: you sign a multi-year SAP contract and everything looks great at the start. But what if a year later the SAP service under-delivers, or your business strategy shifts? Without a clear exit clause, you could be locked in with a solution that no longer fits—still paying hefty fees and struggling to pivot.
Exit clauses in SAP contracts are often overlooked or treated as an afterthought. SAP’s agreements (especially for cloud services like RISE, SuccessFactors, or Ariba) tend to be long-term commitments with few built-in escape hatches.
Vendors rarely offer easy exit terms, and busy project teams may overlook “what if” scenarios during negotiations.
The result? If things change or SAP doesn’t meet expectations, you’re stuck with limited options—potentially footing the bill for underperforming services and facing a complex, costly transition to something new. Read our guide to SAP Contract Terms & Clauses to Negotiate: Protecting Flexibility and Reducing Risk.
This guide is a roadmap to avoid that fate. We’ll break down the essential exit provisions you should negotiate—from termination for convenience to data migration support—so you can protect your company’s interests.
The goal is straightforward: ensure your SAP contract includes clear exit strategies, providing you with flexibility and leverage if SAP fails to deliver on its promises.
1. Why Exit Clauses Matter in SAP Contracts
SAP contracts—especially for cloud services like RISE with SAP, SuccessFactors, or Ariba—are typically long-term commitments (often 3–5 years).
Once you’re in, you’re in for the full term. Without explicit exit language in the contract, you’re effectively locked in regardless of performance issues or business changes. In other words, even if SAP isn’t delivering as promised, or if your company’s strategy shifts, you still have to stick with (and pay for) the solution until the contract ends.
This lack of flexibility can be costly and risky. It means you could be funding an underperforming service with no escape route, and SAP is aware of this.
You lose leverage to demand improvements or concessions because the vendor realizes you can’t easily leave. For CIOs and procurement teams, signing a deal with no exit clause is an enormous risk.
Risks Without Exit Clauses:
- Paying for underperforming services until the end of the term
- No leverage if SAP consistently fails SLAs
- Inability to adapt if the business strategy changes
Checklist:
☐ Exit risks assessed
☐ Draft contract reviewed for exit rights
☐ Business scenarios identified where exit may be necessary
2. Termination for Convenience (TFC)
Termination for Convenience is the ultimate contract escape hatch: it allows you to exit without needing to prove that SAP did anything wrong (no breach is required). It’s essentially an “any reason” termination clause. SAP doesn’t include TFC by default, but it’s a powerful term to negotiate if you can.
One strategy is to build in a TFC right after a fixed commitment period. For example, in a 5-year (60-month) deal, you might negotiate the right to terminate for convenience after 24 months. That way, SAP still gets a guaranteed two-year commitment, but you retain an option to leave mid-term if needed.
Of course, SAP will resist giving you an easy out. Instead, aim for a compromise: a predefined penalty if you terminate early (for example, agreeing to pay 6 months’ fees). The key is that any cost to exit is capped and known upfront, so you’re not facing unlimited liability if you walk away.
Pros of TFC:
- Maximum flexibility to adapt or exit if business needs change
- Provides leverage against SAP complacency (SAP knows you have an out if they underperform)
Risks of TFC:
- Likely higher upfront costs (SAP may charge a premium for giving you this flexibility)
- SAP might limit the scope (e.g. TFC only after a certain time or excluding certain critical systems)
To illustrate, consider some TFC scenarios and their impact:
| TFC Structure | Example (5-year contract) | Business Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Full TFC | Right to exit after 2 years, no penalties | High flexibility – you can leave if needed with no extra cost |
| Penalty TFC | Right to exit anytime with 6 months’ fee as penalty | Moderate flexibility – you can leave, but at a known cost (budget for it) |
| No TFC | Locked in for all 5 years (no early exit) | Zero flexibility – must stick it out regardless of issues |
Checklist:
☐ TFC clause included in contract
☐ Any penalty terms are known and budgeted
☐ “Plan B” if full TFC is rejected (e.g., shorter term or alternative concessions)
Protect your IP, Intellectual Property, and Licensing Rights in SAP Contracts (What’s Yours vs Theirs).
3. Termination for Cause
Termination for cause is your contractual “back door” if SAP fails to uphold its end of the bargain. Standard contracts allow it only for a major breach, so push to broaden that definition. Your contract should explicitly include specific situations where you can exit early due to SAP’s shortcomings.
Define cause broadly, for example:
- Persistent SLA breaches – If SAP repeatedly misses service levels (e.g., uptime or performance targets), it should trigger an exit right after a defined number of failures.
- Material changes to offerings – If SAP significantly changes or deprecates the service/features you signed up for (for instance, they alter the product in a way that undermines its value to you), you shouldn’t be stuck with it.
- Security or compliance failures – If SAP experiences major security breaches, data losses, or fails to meet critical regulatory requirements (such as GDPR or industry-specific rules), you need the ability to terminate the contract immediately for cause.
Insist on clear notice-and-cure provisions for any termination events. Define exactly how long SAP has to fix issues once you notify them of a breach.
For example, after 3 SLA violations in 12 months, you might give SAP a 30-day window to cure the problem. If they don’t, you can terminate. For a severe issue like a data breach that jeopardizes your data, you might negotiate an immediate termination right with no cure period (since the damage can’t be undone).
Key Terms to Secure:
- Specific breach thresholds that trigger exit (e.g., 3 SLA failures within 12 months)
- Defined cure period lengths (30–60 days are typical for most breaches)
- Immediate termination rights for critical violations (security breaches, compliance failures)
Checklist:
☐ Termination for cause clauses clearly define vendor breaches
☐ SLA performance issues tied to exit rights
☐ Notice and cure process for breaches documented
4. Portability of Licenses and Exit Paths
In SAP’s cloud offerings (e.g., RISE, SuccessFactors, Ariba), you’re essentially renting the software. If you leave that cloud, what happens to the money and effort you’ve put in? Without a plan for license portability, you may have to start over, purchasing new licenses or migrating to a new solution with no credit for what you have already spent.
To avoid that nightmare, negotiate options to preserve your investment. Key options to consider include:
- Conversion rights – The option to convert your cloud subscription into a perpetual on-premise license if you leave the cloud. For example, you might pay a one-time fee to turn your subscription into a traditional license that you can run on your own servers. This way, you’re not left empty-handed after years of subscription payments.
- Transition assistance – Support from SAP to help you move off their cloud. Ensure the contract includes some assistance with migration – whether technical guidance or a short overlapping service period – so you can switch systems smoothly.
- Portability credits – If you plan to stay with SAP in another form (say, moving from one SAP cloud to another or to on-premise), negotiate credit for unused fees. For example, if you exit mid-term, have a portion of prepaid fees applied to new SAP licenses or services, so you don’t lose all that value.
The benefit of portability clauses is obvious: they keep your prior investments from becoming sunk costs. You retain some value or assets even if you change course. Pros of Portability: It ensures you have something to show for the money spent (licenses, credits, or assistance) instead of walking away empty-handed. Risks of Absence: Without these clauses, leaving SAP means forfeiting your investment and rebuilding your IT capabilities from scratch.
Checklist:
☐ License portability options discussed and documented in the contract
☐ Conversion or credit arrangements negotiated (if moving off SAP cloud)
☐ Transition plan (for data and systems) budgeted and, if possible, tested in advance
A must have items, 5 Must-Have Clauses in Your Next SAP Contract.
5. Data Retrieval and Transition Assistance
When it comes time to exit, your data is your lifeline. You need to ensure that the contract requires SAP to cooperate in extracting your data and facilitating a smooth transition. Don’t assume it will be easy—spell it out.
Key data exit obligations to negotiate in the contract include:
- Complete data export – SAP must provide a full export of your data in a standard, usable format. You don’t want your data “trapped” in a proprietary format or spread across too many files. The contract should require SAP to provide you with all the necessary information to transfer your data elsewhere.
- Secure deletion and confirmation – Once you leave, SAP should securely delete your data from their systems and provide certification of deletion. This protects you from any later security issues (and ensures compliance with privacy laws).
- Transition support – SAP should offer reasonable support during your migration to a new platform or provider. This could involve technical assistance or, at the very least, a grace period of access. For instance, some companies negotiate a 30–60 day read-only access window after termination, allowing them to verify data and maintain continuity while new systems go live.
If you ignore these considerations, an exit can quickly become a nightmare. Data may be slow to arrive, incomplete, or prohibitively expensive to retrieve. Think about the following risks of not addressing data in your exit plan:
Data Exit Risks if Ignored:
- Delays in migration (if getting your data takes too long)
- Incomplete or inaccessible data (if SAP’s export isn’t comprehensive or usable)
- Unexpected charges for data export (if SAP imposes extra fees to hand over your data)
To prevent these issues, make data handling a core part of your contract negotiations.
Checklist:
☐ Data export rights (format, timeline) secured in contract
☐ Data deletion and security obligations written and agreed upon
☐ Transition/migration assistance from SAP documented
6. Building a Negotiation Strategy Around Exit Clauses
Having the right exit clauses in mind is one thing; getting SAP to agree to them is another. Vendors like SAP often resist strong customer-friendly exit terms, so you need a smart negotiation approach.
Here are some tactics to help you secure those exit rights:
- Use exit clauses as a bargaining chip – Be prepared to give something to get something. For example, you might accept a slightly smaller discount or commit to a longer term if SAP agrees to a mid-term exit option. Trading a bit of up-front value can secure the critical flexibility you need.
- Frame it as risk management, not a lack of faith – Position your requests for exit clauses as standard corporate governance and risk mitigation measures. Ensure SAP understands that this isn’t about planning to leave them; it’s about protecting your business in case circumstances change. You might explain that your board or executives require contingency plans for critical vendors. When presented this way, SAP is more likely to see your point and not view the ask as an insult or a sign of lost confidence.
- Get executive sponsorship – Involve your C-level executives to back these clauses. If your CIO or CFO makes it clear that robust exit provisions are a non-negotiable priority, SAP will take it seriously. High-level backing often pressures SAP to be more flexible on terms it’d otherwise resist.
Ultimately, negotiating strong exit clauses gives you control over your destiny in the SAP relationship. You hope to never use these escape hatches, but you’ll be grateful to have them if you need to.
Checklist:
☐ Exit clauses tied into overall risk management strategy
☐ Trade-offs (e.g., pricing concessions) prepared to win flexibility
☐ Executive sponsors (CIO/CFO) aligned and advocating for exit options
Read about our SAP Negotiation Service
